In most cases that's not what the average user enjoys because using 3DLut typically clamps the gamut such that we will no longer see the highest saturation color of the monitor's default RGB primaries. You can_ use it with artificial profiles but if you're not measuring the device, even if the result is a smoother gradient, it's probably a very incorrect gamma/rgb tracking, so you either lose some contrast in the case of an aritifical srgb_gamma profile, or end up with some random gamut distortion.Īs for the 3DLut situation, if you want absolute colorimetric response, YES, 3DLut can do that for you. You only need it if you're applying a color-profile built from some-physical measurement. I think some of you guys are confused as to who should be using the dithering bit. And I found this picture(bottom part with gradients) to be best example for testing Temporal: Be sure to try all types of dithering and bit mode combinations because some don't work at all for me or look bugged. Default option is obviously "disabled" and just checking "enabled" without clamping makes dithering work albeit only in certain modes. Tested more and more and managed to get to run Temporal dithering 8-bit mode in EDID mode without using ICC. Yet the effects are really minuscule and look more like a bug than a feature. Clamping it makes different gradients flicker.
Just enabling Spatial Dynamic 8-bit mode without clamping affects the gradient picture by making certain gradients flicker. Yet I can not enable dithering when I am in EDID mode. Moreover, my EDID and ICC profile(sRGB2014.icc from ) are exactly the same.
#INSTALL ICC PROFILE NVIDIA 1080P#
I've tested this more(had no time earlier) and the only difference with dithering are green colors and only when using Spatial Dynamic 8-bit mode(my display is normal 1080p SDR 8-bit panel).
0 kommentar(er)
